Judge Hendrik Steenhuis dismissed Wilders’ lawyers arguments that he was being singled out, saying prosecutors have broad leeway in determining when they think someone has crossed the line from offensive speech to discriminatory speech.
Wilders is accused of discrimination and inciting racism for remarks in 2014, televised live, in which he led a roomful of followers in chanting that they wanted “fewer” Moroccans in the Netherlands.
Steenhuis set the start date for the three-week trial on October 31, meaning a verdict would be likely in December – well ahead of national elections in March.
Wilders’ far-right Freedom Party is neck-and-neck with Prime Minister Mark Rutte’s ruling conservative VVD Party in popularity polls.
Wilders response to the ruling was that he was being “prosecuted for what millions (of Dutch people) think”. Via Twitter he also indicated he thinks the process against him is politically motivated.
In 2011, he was acquitted of inciting racial hatred charges for calling for the Quran to be banned and for the deportation of “criminal” Moroccans. Judges said that his remarks, while offensive to some, were within the bounds of legitimate political discourse.
Many observers felt the trial helped increase his popularity as he was able to showcase himself as a champion of free speech.