Home Secretary Amber Rudd has defended plans to make firms do more to employ British people, saying “don’t call me a racist” for talking about immigration.

Under her proposals, firms could be forced to disclose what percentage of their workforce is non-British as a way to encourage them to hire more locals.

Ms Rudd said she wanted to “flush out” companies abusing existing rules and “nudge them into better behaviour”.

Business has attacked the idea while one Tory MP called it “divisive”.

  • Rolling updates on UKIP leadership and Conservative conference
  • Embrace centre ground, PM tells Tories
  • Conservatives target Labour’s BME voters
  • Migrant curbs ‘to change tide of opinion’

Ms Rudd, who was appointed home secretary in July, told the Conservative conference on Tuesday that extra curbs on foreign workers and students may be needed to “change the tide” of public opinion on immigration in the wake of the vote to leave the EU.

Firms, she said, were “getting away” with not training enough British workers and the existing resident labour test – which requires firms to advertise vacancies in the UK for 28 days before looking outside the EU – should be toughened up.

‘Clear incentive’

Under proposals which are to be subject to consultation, companies recruiting staff from outside the EU will have to demonstrate what they have done to “foster a pool of local candidates” and show what impact the choice of overseas candidates have on the local labour market.

Briefing notes after the speech also suggested they could be required to “be clear about the proportion of their workforce which is international”, a practice which the Home Office says is standard in the US.

Ms Rudd said the existing system did not give firms a “clear incentive” to properly consider the merits of local candidates or to spend more on training to equip them to do the jobs on offer.

Asked whether she was prepared to “name and shame” companies which did not comply by publishing a breakdown of the nationality of their workforce, Ms Rudd told BBC Radio 4’s Today it was “not something we are definitely going to do” but it was “one of the tools” under review “as a way of nudging people into better behaviour”.

While many companies were doing a great job employing local staff, she said there were firms “which are not so constructive and these are the ones we want to flush out” – citing one business she knew of where 80% of whose staff were from outside the UK.

“There is still one in ten 18-24 year olds in the UK who are unemployed,” she added. “I want businesses to think first about locally training people where possible… and work with us to deliver what we need to have which is a more skilled local labour force.”

‘Language trap’

In 2009, Prime Minister Gordon Brown was criticised for suggesting that firms should give preference to local staff where they could – a policy that was dubbed in the media “British jobs for British workers”.

Ms Rudd, who campaigned to remain in the EU during the referendum, said she was careful not “to fall into the trap” of using such language – particularly given the volatile climate after the Brexit vote in which immigration remains a highly-charged issue and some areas have seen a rise in hate crimes.

“I am very aware about the language and when I looked at the speech and thought how I would present it,” she said.

But she said immigration could not be a no-go area for politicians. “We should be able to have a conversation about the skills we need.

“I don’t think we should have a situation where we can’t talk about immigration. We must not ignore the fact that people want to talk about immigration and if we do talk about immigration don’t call me a racist.”

Skills gaps

Business groups reacted warily to the proposals, warning they would limit their members’ ability to recruit people with the right skills for the job.

“Companies do so much in the UK to train up their workers and, of course, look for local hires before going to the overseas market,” said Adam Marshall, acting director general of the British Chambers of Commerce.

“I don’t think they should be penalised for having to do so when they have specific skills needs.”

The EEF said more than two in three UK manufacturers it represented offered apprenticeships while the CBI warned of extra bureaucracy and costs for business.

“British companies invest £45bn a year training workers in the UK,” said its deputy director general Josh Hardie. “But there are skills gaps right now and if firms do not fill them they cannot grow and spread prosperity.”


And Tory MP Neil Carmichael, chair of the Commons education select committee and member of the Open Britain campaign, urged Ms Rudd to reconsider the plan.

“This unsettling policy would drive people, business and compassion out of British society and should not be pursued any further,” he said.

“People coming to the UK to work hard, pay their taxes and make a contribution to our society should be celebrated not shamed.

“This kind of divisive politics has no place in 21st Century Britain.”

Ministers say they are still committed to reducing net migration to “sustainable” levels – taken to mean below 100,000 a year – even though David Cameron failed to meet the target between 2010 and 2015, with net migration recently exceeding 300,000.